The Central Operating Unit (UCO) links the expenses of José Luis Ábalos that Koldo García assumed of which there is no documentary record that they were returned with the stage in which the payments of the commissioner Víctor de Aldama were supposedly produced and in which, according to the investigation, the “bite” would have been distributed for alleged loves of public works awards for which it is in the provisional prison June the former secretary of the PSOE Santos Cerdán organization.
This is highlighted by the Civil Guard in its latest report on the heritage of the former Minister of Transportation, in which he directs the focus towards the expenses of Ábalos and people in his surroundings “who would have been suffered from an alternative source of income”, in this case by whom his advisor was directly bank accounts ».
And it is that the agents have not been able to identify “any financial compensation by Ábalos neither before nor after payment” through the “known banking circuit”, although in some cases it has found what it calls a “expectation of return” of those amounts.
The same “temporary section”
But the police analysis draws attention to the fact that these disbursements whose origin continues under suspicion coincides “with the period in which the investigated facts are produced” and in particular with “the alleged cash deliveries” of Aldama and “the temporary section where after the award of public works contracts to certain companies, economic consideration would have occurred,” according to the UCO itself, according to the UCO itself.
The agents have reached the conviction, after the analysis of hundreds of Wasaps among the protagonists of the alleged plot, that Koldo García “repeatedly attended to the economic needs of Ábalos”, a dynamic that confirms “in multiple exchanges of messages between them”, as well as between his advisor and Patricia Uriz. They refer to “income, payments or deliveries of money that would directly benefit Ábalos or people around.”
The “family nucleus” accounts of Ábalos
In each case, the UCO has proven whether after the expenses assumed by Koldo “there is an equivalent movement in the Ábalos accounts that could indicate that he assumed the expense” and in a negative case, it has been analyzed if whoever was his advisor used for those payments “his own accounts or those of his surroundings.” So when a banking movement has not been located in Koldo’s accounts “the use of cash” has been inferred by the latter.
And although in relation to some of these payments, bank transfers have been found that justify their reimbursement, in other cases it has not been so, because the then minister “does not perform any cash withdrawal that allows us to infer that the amount paid by Koldo would have been compensated previously or subsequently.” Or, also, because his ministerial advisor “receives no transfer” of his boss for that concept, “neither by similar amount, before nor after the operation.”
However, the Civil Guard makes a caveat and admits that its analysis is conditioned by the fact that it has not been able to examine “the banking movements of the family nucleus of Ábalos.”