Nor salary equalization, No early retirementNor recognition as risk professionals … None of the claims of national police and civil guards seem to have a place in the plans of the Minister of the Interior, Fernando Grande-Marlaska. A neglect and a neglect that has caused several unions, including equalization already (eya), have declared Permanent collective conflict And they have stopped attending the meetings of a Police Council, marked by the controversy.
The trigger for this decision arrived in January last year, after Marlaska hid them that the judgment of the National Court had appealed, which forced him to renegotiate salary equalization. A fact that led them to “distrust” the promises of the head of Interior. For this reason, “in protest,” they stopped attending these meetings and took the initiative in the Congress of Deputies, where they registered a proposal to match the pensions of the State Security Forces and Bodies with the rest of the police officers regional and local, which have already been recognized as a risk profession. A fast route that translates into the so -called “Retirement Help.”
At this point, we fed “challenge” three police council meetings, understanding that “The right to freedom of association” violated. And, as its president denounces, Natan Espinosa, within these meetings there is no “union equity.” Specifically, it refers to that of December 12 and its agreements, as well as the review of those held on June 24 and October 31, 2024.
Without representatives of the basic scale
As stated in the replacement resource presented by the union, in these meetings There was no “minimal quorum”so “the Commission cannot adopt valid agreements without the presence of the absolute majority of the counselors in the first call and five representatives of the officials in the second call.” The contest of the contested meeting shows that only nine representatives of the Administration and two of the officials attended, therefore not only the requirement of the quorum but also the A “Joint Composition” and “Balanced” To make decisions.
And along this line, the letter also suggests that all the police scales were not represented in those meetings. In fact, in the list of attendees, the only vowels on behalf of the officials belonged to the upper scale and the executive. There were no representative of the basic scale and sub -inspection. “This violates the principle of proportional and democratic representation, since the basic scale represents most police officers,” says Espinosa.
Finally, they warn in their appeal that among the attendees there was a person who was not designated as a titular member or substitute for the Police Council. “The Inclusion of a person without formal designationaffects the validity of deliberations, by allowing a person without legitimation to exercise functions within the organ. This can lead to the nullity of all the agreements adopted in the contested session, “denounces the president of Eya.
Therefore, the equalization union already requires, in addition to the challenge of these three meetings, a reform of the regulation that It is not subject to the “unilateral blockade of the administration” and that guarantees “union equity.” Likewise, request that Freedom of association is not limited and the representation of all the scales of the National Police is guaranteed in the future meetings of the Council.