Interior prepares a discreet device for Begoña Gómez’s statement

He Home Office Prepare a more discreet device than on the previous occasions for Begoña Gómez’s visit to the Courts of Plaza de Castilla, according to police sources to La Razón. Pedro Sánchez’s wife will have to testify for the fourth time before Juan Carlos Peinado And the general premise will be, once again, to avoid photographs in judicial units.

Experience always involves a point in favor and more when it comes to specifying security devices. Since Begoña Gómez’s first state Castilla Square.

In this way, the tension of their visits to the judicial units has been reduced by the repeated of them. In its premiere, there was a small concentration in front of the courts. A tension that was reduced in the following days.

This is the main reason that has led to National Police and al Home Office to considerably reduce the number of agents that will be part of the security device. More than half a hundred came more than a year ago but now the figure will be set at just over twenty troops from the Police Intervention Unit (UIP).

Sánchez’s wife’s photo

These agents have the main task that they do not occur alterations of public order in the immediate vicinity of Plaza Castilla. There is no manifestation in the surroundings or the presence of radicals that seek to hinder the normal functioning of the declaration.

Once again, the forecast suggests that Begoña Gómez will enter the Courts through the garage and your stay in common areas will be minimal to avoid capturing your snapshot. The photograph of Pedro Sánchez’s wife in these units already leaked in his first visits.

Begoña Gómez asks the Madrid audience to prevent the UCO from analyzing its emailsEuropa Press

Of course, the task that is not immortalized will correspond to the Moncloa security team. The objective of the UIP is only to monitor that there are no incidents in the vicinity. The riot equipment They are already summoned this Wednesday at seven in the morning to provide their service.

More than a year ago Begoña Gómez first went to declare before Judge Peinado. In that premiere, five days before the European elections, Pedro Sánchez’s wife claimed that he had no knowledge of the cause and the magistrate stopped his testimony.

The second visit occurred on July 19, 2024 and the wife of the President of the Government accepted his right not to declare. Gomez’s most extensive testimony occurred during his third appearance against hairstyle. It was December 18, 2024.

Begoña Gómez rejected any irregularity in the chair that co -directed in the Complutense Universityin which he did not appropriate any brand, and assured that he did not intermediate in favor of the businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés, because he did not participate in any public bidding process. Begoña Gómez was giving explanations for 35 minutes but only answered the questions of his defense.

Begoña Gómez’s fourth statement

On that occasion, it could already be detected A minor security device by the National Police agents. The circumstances have assumed that on this fourth time, the operation is practically the one of a normal day.

A consultant responds to the 'Begoña Gómez Case Judge who did not participate in the' software 'of the Complutense
A consultant responds to the ‘Begoña Gómez Case Judge who did not participate in the’ software ‘of the ComplutenseEuropa Press

The case of Begoña Gómez has taken a new course since, in mid -August, Hajinado imputed to the wife of the President of the Government a fifth crime, this time embezzlement of public flows, for the private efforts made to her by the advisor of Moncloa Cristina Álvarezlinked to the chair that co -directed at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM). It adds to the crimes of influence peddling, corruption in business, improper appropriation and professional intrusion by which it was already investigated judicially.

At first, Hajinado quoted Sanchez’s wife on September 11 but had to advance the appointment for the schedule problems of his lawyer who had to go to another judicial event. On this occasion, the judge will only ask him about the alleged “Deviation of public funds in favor of private interests” Related, directly, with the professional activity developed by the president’s wife in the Complutense.