The magistrate who instructs the “Villarejo case” at the National Court, Antonio Piña, has dismissed the petition of the retired commissioner to impute the businessman Javier Pérez Dolset and two more people in the case after knowing that both he and Leire Díez, the “Fontanera” of the PSOEthey were made with his audios and took them to Ferraz. In that sense, the judge – and also the Anti -Corruption Prosecutor’s Office – specify that it is material obtained in “Open Sources” and that it will not be investigated in this macrocousa because It’s “foreign” to the same.
Thus it follows from two writings, which advances the reason, and in which it is specified that all these audios that Pérez Dolset contributed to the case in 2022 They have already been subject to analysis. It should be remembered that the PSOE, personly as a popular accusation, has tried unsuccessfully that the judge adhered all the material to this procedure (also including a Villarejo report on the Gay Saunas of the father of Begoña Gómez). However, both anti -corruption and the National Court They have denied access to this material Because it is not part of the procedure.
In fact, Pérez Dolset and the PSOE Fontanera -who is investigated in a Madrid Court for his alleged ones maneuvers against the UCO, judges and prosecutors– They made all this material available to Ferraz. The businessman (who is appeared in this case as a victim of Villarejo) took the PSOE all the material collected for years and, as he says, would mainly contain audios on irregular operations of the “Patriotic Police”.
Leire’s pendrive
The PSOE referred to the State Attorney General and this, in turn, to the Prosecutor’s Office of the National Court, which opened cause a few weeks ago To investigate the content of the device, as this means revealed. In fact, he commissioned the proceedings to the Central Operating Unit (UCO) of the Civil Guard, which is currently analyzing the entire material. The content of this device is the same audios that Pérez Dolset contributed in the “Villarejo case” in 2022 in order to investigate.
The then instructor, Manuel García Castellón, referred them to a separate piece (number 34) and commissioned his analysis to the National Police Internal Affairs Unit, which determined that many of them They come from open sources. However, some of them (such as those related to conversations between the former secretary of the PP María Dolores de Cospedal and Villarejo himself) referred to the corresponding pieces. The remaining ones departed of the procedure for not having a link with the espionages that are investigated here.
However, Villarejo moved file after the “fontanera case” exploded and asked that an improper use of his material be investigated. The commissioner echoed the meeting that Díez held with a businessman charged at the National Court in the framework of which I was looking for dirty rags against the Civil Guard. To this event others were added with businessmen, charged in the Koldo case and anti -corruption prosecutors. Díez and Pérez Dolset reacted ensuring that the meetings are framed in a research work on the sewers of the PP.
Anticorruption: “The source is unknown”
In that sense, Pérez Dolset said in several interviews that He had dedicated himself for years to collect all the material that was intervened to Villarejo after his arrest in November 2017 and that had invested more than Five million euros To analyze them. However, the commissioner’s defense denounced in June that they had organized “Like a parapolicial group” and that they disseminated private audios of the cause “A claim to work under government orders”.
Therefore, he requested the imputation of this businessman, of the journalist Patricia López and Alejandro Suárez Sánchez-Acaña, owner of the Digital Moncloa.com, claiming on the latter that facilitated his audios. Specifically, he requested that it be investigated whether the “filtered” documents by Pérez Dolset had been obtained from the Villarejo case and if there was a “illegal use” of them “To extort Or, at least, defame third parties, according to them they have publicly recognized. “
The Anti -corruption prosecutor opposed to the request of Villarejo remembering that all this material (which was subsequently delivered in a pendrive to the PSOE) comes from open sources and that, therefore, No advertising restriction weighs About it. However, he admits that not all files handled by the alleged emissaries of the PSOE are part of the seized to Villarejo. In line, he remembers that it was already valued to incorporate only the audios into the cause that, “indeed, referred to the facts investigated” while the rest was left out, although the Socialist Party has given the battle to access them by judicial means.
The judge: “He is oblivious to the investigation”
“The origin is unknown Or the source of the audio files published in the media, the truth is that the audio files from the separate piece 34 are not subject to any advertising restriction agreed judicially. Different issue is that its formal incorporation into the present case does not proceed when they are oblivious To the facts under investigation, “said the Anti -Corruption Prosecutor of the Villarejo case, César de Rivas.
The magistrate, in a car signed on September 22, adopts the criterion of the Fiscal Ministry and explains that what is requested by the undercover agent is not part of this procedure, within the framework of which half -piece of pieces were opened to investigate their espionage orders. In addition, it indicates that The complaint “does not have any objective support” nor with “no proof principle” that justifies attributing the commission of crime to the denounced.
It should be remembered that Pérez Dolset (to whom the National Court has prosecuted for the bankruptcy of its technological) contributed in 2022 a pendrive with seven folders which contained, in turn, 39 root files. They were named: “National Audience”; “Astapa” (in reference to the cause against the former socialist mayor of Estepona Antonio Barrientos); “Pheasant”; “Jl Pérez” (in possible allusion to José Luis Pérez, an informant of Villarejo in the investigation against Sandro Rosell); “Olive” (in reference to the former UDEF chief with the PP, José Luis Olivera); The folder “Pp” and one last without title.