Joan Laporta today he broke his silence on the precautionary Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor. “We presented the documentation to LaLiga on December 27. We sent it within the deadline, before the end of the year. During the 28th, 29th, 30th and 31st, LaLiga asked us to complete the documentation. We thought we already complied with the rule 1:1 but LaLiga asked us for additional documentation. In our opinion we were already complying with the laws and we turned to the RFEF,” alleged the culé president.
The culé president also spoke about all the criticism received. “The members have understood that it was an attack and a way to destabilize the entity. The shield is not stained. Any campaign to discredit the club will not prevent us from being a reference in the world of football and admired everywhere,” he said. Laporta.
“I explain things and you interpret however you want. In September we could close the agreement with Nike to be 1:1, but it was worse than the current one. Having alternatives, we opted for them. There was a certain risk, yes, as a certain alternative. Nike We had a 1:1 but at the cost of a worse contract. We had the alternative of Christensen, that of Ter Stegen that we did not get, the judicial alternative did not go well like that of Gavi“.
Another of the key issues for Laporta was the issue of the boxes. “It is a company of Qatar and another of Emirates. There are confidentiality contracts. LaLiga has all the contracts. We have given up 475 seats. And the sausage with mongetes and the lies that they eat them with potatoes,” he said.