Fed of the Ninguneo, the negligia, the manipulation and deceptions of the Ministry of Interior and its owner, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, on February 12 the equalization union already (Eya) presented a appeal for replacement to “challenge” three meetings of the Police Council, understanding that there were “The right to freedom of association” violated. And, as its president denounced, Natan Espinosa, within these meetings there is no “union equity.” Specifically, it refers to that of December 12 and its agreements, as well as the review of those held on June 24 and October 31, 2024.
The response to this resource came through the Secretariat of the Police Council, which He dismissed what was requested under the argument that “it is not appropriate to declare the nullity or cancellation of the meeting and as agreed in it”, since The aforementioned meetings were held “according to the established quorum in the Regulation of Organization and Internal Operation of the Police Council “. Norma that sets the constitution of said commission in” seven representatives of the Administration and an equivalent representation of the officials. “Thus, the president of Eya presented an appeal of elevation before the General Directorate of the Police (DGP), which was also dismissed.
And at this point, far from throwing the towel, the union has decided to go one step further and present a contentious-administrative resource before the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid To demand The repeal of the aforementioned regulation that prevails in the Police Council. Because in this fight, which has now reached the courts, they reiterate that in those meetings There was no “minimal quorum”.
Without “minimum quorum” or “parity”
A fact that they insist from the brief of their first appeal: “The Commission cannot adopt valid agreements without the presence of the absolute majority of the counselors in the first call and five representatives of the officials in the second call.” In this sense, the act of the contested meeting shows that only nine representatives of the administration and two of the officials attended, therefore Not only did the quorum requirement but also that of A “Joint Composition” and “Balanced” To make decisions.
In addition, the letter also suggested that all the police scales were not represented in those meetings. In fact, in the list of attendees, the only vowels on behalf of the officials belonged to the upper scale and the executive. There were no representative of the basic scale and sub -inspection scale. “This violates the principle of proportional and democratic representation, since the basic scale represents most police officers,” he denounced in his day Espinosa.
Finally, they warned that among the attendees there was a person who was not designated as a titular member or substitute for the Police Council. “The Inclusion of a person without formal designationaffects the validity of deliberations, by allowing a person without legitimation to exercise functions within the organ. This can lead to the nullity of all the agreements adopted in the contested session, “denounces the president of Eya.
Therefore, from the equalization union they already denounce the “Unilateral Block” of the Administration and demand that the representation of all the scales of the National Police be guaranteed. Without forgetting the challenge of the three meetings cited and the repeal of an obsolete regulation.